A date etched in history

The University of Newcastle Cultural Collections has this image of an etching of Lambton, that is dated “c. 1880’s”. Here’s my attempt to narrow down the date more precisely, assuming that the creator of the etching hasn’t left things out or added things in for artistic reasons.

The first thing to note is in respect to two major Lambton buildings – the etching shows the Post Office in Morehead St, but not the Mechanics Institute in Elder St. This unequivocally dates the etching in the period 1884-1894.

Secondly, in the Elder St and Morehead St corner of Lambton Park, the council chambers built in 1887 is absent.

Thirdly, in looking at Lambton Park, it is noticeably empty – no buildings or trees or paths. This would suggest that the etching is from a time shortly after the land was cleared of houses (1884) and before any substantial work on developing the park commenced. Close inspection of the etching shows that the park is surrounded by a sawn picket fence, which again dates the etching to post 1884. Another article from 1885 says that a second shorter fence was being built around the park, twelve feet in from the outer fence. There is no sign of this second inner fence in the etching.

Putting all this together I would suggest that the date of the etching is 1884 – 1885.
Lambton Library. Former Council Chambers.DSC04264


AmericaShufflendipity. noun. The amusing juxtaposition of two otherwise unrelated tracks when playing your music in shuffle mode.

Example: I was listening to my music in shuffle mode in the car earlier this week when I heard “America” by Simon and Garfunkel, immediately followed by “This is not America” by David Bowie.


All the rage again

It’s my 25th wedding anniversary today. The other contracting party to this celebration has a strong desire to maintain a non-presence on the internet, so the non-mention of that person in this blog post is out of respect, not disrespect. So instead, let me reflect on the nature of marriage from this quote from a 22 Jul 1874 newspaper article, which again uses that modern sounding phrase “all the rage” …

Weddings are all the rage“Weddings are all the rage here at present. There has been three couple united in the bonds of wedlock since Friday last.”

Within this one sentence, marriage is described with the words “united”, “bonds” and “wedlock”; three words that emphasise the permanent joining together of two persons to become one flesh, a thoroughly biblical understanding. This is in contrast to the modern view of marriage as

  • a partnership (rather than a unity);
  • of two people hanging out together for mutual convenience (rather than a bond);
  • while ever romantic feelings of love persist (rather than a wedlock of permanence).

I like the 1874 definition better, and hope it becomes all the rage again.